We have this round of financial sleight to Gilles Arthur, Garcimore or Gérard Majax? No! At this famous swindler who had managed to sell the Eiffel Tower of poor little looking Japanese tourists? No more! But in the word crook, is a part of the solution...
It is our dear once again (sic!) Government that we must congratulate on this fantastic coup de Jarnac. But beware, "They" have explanations, "They" have reason to do such a thing, "They" are compelled and forced! Why? But because the France knows a deficit of 38 billion euros, and that sales of highways would it only some 13 billion and would allow Paris to keep its European commitments vis à vis of Brussels which would not fail to the France a fine if its deficit to exceed 3% of GDP!
At the same time, and by the way, know that this would not solve the external debt of our beautiful country which it rises more than 1000 billion euros (taxpayer, not yet closes your door currency, the France need you!).
The real question is: how is it possible to sell a "heritage of State" as easily without having to ask his opinion to the taxpayer yet the property owner? Because the law is formal about it: "any action for sale, privatization and opening of capital of more than 50% by the State owned company, must be voted by the Parliament (direct representative of the people)". Simple, just not be majority, at least in the official statutes! I am going to get grace of precise figures and current but hold that State holds direct way from 35 to 41% of the shares of the three companies of French motorways are:
-SANEF (Société of the highways in the North and East of the France)
-APRR (Autoroutes Paris-Rhin-Rhône)
-ASF (motorways in the South of the France)
Therefore, accountable to members. At least until it is discovered, in seeking better, informally, the State, is holder of the society of the France Highway, which it has (as by hazard) of 9 to 38% of the companies sus mentioned 3. Upgrouping of the same blow the actions of the State of 50 to 76% so archi majority! Only this is not "directly".
You better understand the title of this editorial now?... I'm not going "user me keyboard" to write what inspires me such practices, but be sure at least three things:
-Future purchasers will all, and by definition, private companies. Thus, the price of the toll will be largely increased. At the same time, maintenance is revealing particularly expensive, it is likely that degrades the quality of the network (who will go you complain?)
-The price of the rent of the grants awarded to oil tankers, restaurateurs and other convenience stores present on motorways will increase it also inevitably, where a litre of unleaded still more expensive (if possible!) a sandwich wet and without flavor even more hard to swallow and troubleshooting will require you to agree with Europe Assistance before vacation.
- And finally, whatever happens, the certainty that it is always in the State that will get your euros and your points for speed exessive, what is perish if we design the fact to ride on an axis private and paying...
Among the reasons that leads me to tell you that our "national" (for long) roads see departmental are, for those who knew yet, much more conducive to the practice of our passion that these current and future pumps money that are the highways
P.S.: I must confess that I thought otherwise, but the Charter of M.O. said: no policy, step of insults and no appeal to incivility... Then the three at the same time, I would have been required of auto-bannir me!
Cordial V to all
Fastfreddy
(Automated translation with microsoft BING)
|
(not translated yet) Edito Avril 2011: « lairduncon »
